Sunday, September 6, 2015

Hillary's challenge to be seen as "authentic", may not be in her control.


One of Hillary's many barriers to cross........women have a higher standard to meet to be considered "authentic". Men get much more acceptance, or a pass.

http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-women-problem-explained-369153

And I think that's only one of many subconscious prejuduces that any woman has to contend with, but when you are going for the presidency those biases may be amped up significantly.

I may have told this story on SL before, but I think it fits here.....

I have a naturally lower-toned voice which when I was teaching I thought gave me an advantage as being perceived as having authority. I sound sure of myself, confident - often more so than I was, I think. When I started teaching high school I was still 21 years old, I had some male students who were 18 years old and much bigger than I was.  I asked myself through that first semester "what do I do if they won't obey me?" It never happened! In 25 years of teaching high school and college, I never had a discipline problem with any student.

When working for Dept of Army I, on about 3 or 4 occasions, had men tell me that I was intimidating, which surprised me. On one occasion, I was a peer of the man and had hired him to train some facilitators in my program. I sat in as a participant of the training. At one point he said it was absolutely necessary to have a 5 year and 10 year career plan if you are to be successful. I countered, in what I thought was a pleasant way, that the two jobs that I had held in Dept of Army had each not been in existence 10 years before I got the job and the one he and I both held at that moment had not been in existence 5 years before, so we could not have planned them, that sometimes you have to be open to opportunity. ......He was not happy with my response.

A few days later each trainee had to do a sample facilitation with the group. I did mine and waited at the front of the room for feedback from the group. He said "I think you were intimidating in your presentation." I thought "o.k. Jean, listen up, you may learn something." And I asked what I had done that Was intimidating. He said, "you walked up to the easel, planted your feet, squared your shoulders and seemed overly confident." I said "o.k.." Fortunately I didn't have to say anything else because two women who knew me slightly answered him. One was a young Captain who said," that's exactly how officers in the military are trained to make a presentation, you know what your goal is and you stand tall on two feet and present. I thought Jean showed confidence and competence about what she was doing and led the group just the way we have talked about all week." I could have kissed her! A civilian woman spoke up saying "I don't think anybody on Ft Dix thinks Jean Perry is intimidating. She's trained all of us at one time or another and she's a good trainer." More mental kisses...... :)

I find women have a very fine line to tread and it isn't always easy to see, or feel, the line. Most of the time I think we don't even know we've crossed someone else's line as to what they think is ACCEPTABLE for OUR behavior. My good thoughts go out to any woman who is stepping up/out/over the line that has been drawn for us over centuries by the power group who has made the rules and don't understand the "other's" experiences, which they haven't have, but judge the "other" nontheless.

Jean

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Oh Joy!, or Not! Will Hillary Disappear in the Patriarchy?


Oh Joy! Oh Joy! Oh Joy!

 I received in this morning's mail a book that I happened on - I know not where  :P - but when researching for it, I  found it at Amazon for .99 + 3.99 shipping, and how could I pass that by!!!

It's titled Women of Ideas: & what men have done to them by Dale Spender, an Australian feminist who has written several books about women's place in history including Man Made Language and Invisible Women.  When my husband handed me the package and I felt the bulk of it, I wondered "did I order two books?" It's 700 pages plus, but looks like a wonderful read of women's writings over centuries about how it is to live in the "men's world" and what happened to the women's opinions, publications and thoughts.

I am reading the preface and find it very au courant. She gives a little philosophical introduction about her thinking that brought her to compile and write this book. - In reading the feminist literature of the 60s and 70s about patriarchy and women living in the male world and how that impacts on us, and discussing it with other women, they began to ask "are we the first generation of women to have felt this way?" Some of them were vaguely aware that women did have a past of asking these questions, but it was shadowy and random.
She lists a whole paragraph of women writers who shared similar concerns from Abigail Adams to Alice Rossi (1973) and says "With the advent of these publications the question of whether women had thought and felt 

(isolated, invisible, ignored, demeaned, laughed at, considered to be 'sick', because they questioned the systems and posed that patriarchy was a problem)

 before, was put to rest - THEY HAD! Another question arose in its place: why didn't I know, why didn't WE know?........Why were women of the present cut off from women of the past and how was this achieved? " She comments that if we don’t find out, it can happen again……….ala ”war on women.” [Pg3]

I felt it was a currently apropos question because as she continued to talk about what it is to be an "x" in an "o" world and how the people in charge of society can force those without control to abide by their rules or be ostracized, I began to think about what is happening about women's/ racial issues today, about how any "x" gets treated similarly in other "o" worlds. Just exchange the words "male control" with the words "white privilege."

We have seen very clearly the attacks on Pres Obama as he dared to become the president of the U.S. Just imagine what it will be like if Hillary becomes president - at least Obama is a male, thereby having some regard by some of that half of the population - or how bad it will get for her in the election period. A huge part of her unfavorable numbers, I am sure, is that she is a woman challenging the male powerhouse. She must be untrustworthy, because she has the audacity to want to have the greatest power/control on earth! There must be some witchcraft in her somewhere! How could a mere woman have the intelligence, experience, competence to know she shouldn't share classified information???? etc. etc. It's going to be very ugly!

Remember how Hillary's poll numbers improved in the 2007 campaign when she got emotional in NH ? ...... She became "a woman exhibiting proper behavior" for many. What a shame.

I am going to enjoy this book and will probably share more of it with you as I go along. It's going to take a while - 756  pages! I really wish I had the women's group that I was a part of in the early 70s where we discussed so many of the feminist writings, to talk with about this book. What fun that would be!


In sisterhood, Jean